On May 11, 1:36 am, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 9, 6:00 am, A N Niel <ann...@nym.alias.net.invalid> wrote: > > > > > In article > > <b36eb4ca-cbed-41b3-b369-4b0f559a1...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, > > > Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > An informal and highly experimental, unorthadox proof P=NP has been > > > published onCERNpreprints. > > > >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln5758210-9223534-19396... > > > 1468147288IdV-15212827115758210PDF_HI0001.pdf > > > > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere else. My purpose in > > > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen > > > it. > > > > I would specifically, as was my intention with this experiment, like > > > feedback from anyone interested in the methodology I used and > > > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing a more broadly accepted > > > peer-reviewed published proof building on this basic result. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Martin Musatov > > > m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net. > > > The mathematics formulas in that PDF are unintelligible. Was that done > > by you, or bungled by IMAJAM (orCERN) when it was put on-line? > > It was done by me the uploading was intentional and experimental and > deliberate as to the current state. Each step along the way was not. > i.e. the parsing from Google docs and the side left margin vertical > numbering done by my upload at Oxford where just happenstance but they > intrigued be by the uniqueness of the nature of the result. How does > the machine know in the randomness of everything against these > equations to count to 10 at very specific intervals against equations. > That sounds like A.I. to me. Or could there be something more to this? > Could there be a more profound less worldly cause? Deterministic verification phase, checks that the guess is a solution, returning true or false, or looping infinitely.... more ». By Martin Musatov - May 13 ...MeAmI.org - search results
