On May 15, 3:40 pm, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 15, 3:37 pm, MartinMusatov<marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 11, 7:32 am, Chip Eastham <hardm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 11, 5:14 am, MartinMusatov<marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 6:09 pm, MartinMusatov<marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > victor_meldrew_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > > > > > > On 9 May, 19:50, MartinMusatov<marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Also here are some additional related results: 1) Access to > > > > > > > Photograph:http://documents.cern.ch/cgi-bin/setlink?base=PHO&categ=photo-tsic&id... > > > > > > > 2)Conversions Information: Portable Document Format:http:// > > > > > > > documents.cern.ch/archive/electronic/hep-lat/9612/9612008.pdf > > > > > > > Wgat have these to do with your drivel? > > > > > > > > > Does that mean "bogus"?. > > > > > > > > No, you are welcome to try to disprove it. > > > > > > > There is nothing there to disprove; it's "not even wrong". Iagreewith the proof. I cannot deny it by the evidence shown it solves several NP-complete problems referenced here: > > > > > Does not even wrong mean right? If not what does it mean? If something > > > > is not wrong the assumption is someone is dancing around admitting it > > > > is right.--MartinMusatov > > > > Hi, Martin: > > > > No, it means that you have posted > > > rambling, incoherent nonsense. It > > > is not "even wrong" because only > > > statements fall under the logical > > > dichotomy of being true or false, > > > and you write with no reasoned > > > connection with the P vs. NP > > > problem. > > > > Hence your "proof" is not even > > > wrong. You might as well have > > > copied a poem about birds or > > > the ingredients of a cake. > > > > regards, chip > > > Hi Chip, Please again, please be specific with your feedback instead of just bland labels without any logic or math to back up your opinion or claim. > > >--MartinMusatov"My assertion is that I have mathematically proven P=NP". Please explain your opinion on this topic citing mathematics and refraining from insult personal claims or opinions. "Mathematics":- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - P=NP Proof Published at CERN I agree with the proof. I cannot deny it by the evidence shown it solves several NP-complete problems referenced here: Does not even wrong mean right? If not what does it mean? If something is not wrong the assumption is someone is dancing around admitting it is right.--Martin Musatov Hi, Martin: No, it means that ... 3:40pm by Martin Musatov - 107 messages - 15 authors http://groups.google.as/group/sci.math/search?group=sci.math&q=musatov+agree Please address:
