email@example.com wrote: > On 9 May, 19:50, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also here are some additional related results: 1) Access to > > Photograph:http://documents.cern.ch/cgi-bin/setlink?base=PHO&categ=photo-tsic&id... > > 2)Conversions Information: Portable Document Format:http:// > > documents.cern.ch/archive/electronic/hep-lat/9612/9612008.pdf > > Wgat have these to do with your drivel? >I made these results. They are part of my proof P=NP. > > > Does that mean "bogus"?. > > > > No, you are welcome to try to disprove it. > > There is nothing there to disprove; it's "not even wrong".