please do not assume that your readers are so dumb not to be able to make their own tests.
Asking "Who is Bondarenko?" Alpha responded
Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input. * Did you mean: Who is mansakonko?
To the same question Google responded with this top link knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Bondarenko_crater/
So Google might (rightly?) think you are the man in the moon. However I find Alpha's answer more creative.
Seemingly you are very interested in Alpha. So it would be nice to read your thoughts in a more explicit form.
For example it is not clear to me whether you noticed that the answers are categorical different: Google points to an entry in a sorted list whereas Alpha tries to find his own answer.
In some way this reminds me of the days computer chess started. I bought such a machine and, believe it or not, I did win. I was very pleased. Then I read this article in Scientific America which told me that I have not be afraid to lose against a computer in my lifetime. I was even more pleased. I do not have to tell you the rest of the story. The chess engine on my PC has an estimated ELO rating of about 3000 whereas I could not increase my abilities to the same level.
So what role are you going to play? Do you want to tell us: "Look how easily a bright chap like me can make jokes out of the dumb Alpha machine. Do not believe that semantic information mining will ever bring new insights on your desktop." ?