On 3 Jun., 04:37, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote: > In article <db512ef4-fbff-48ee-af30-ed25dc9b7...@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> writes: > > On Jun 1, 6:38=A0am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > Therefore I don=92t do so, but teach good mathematics, namely > > > mathematics that is free of confusing the different kinds of infinity > > > and free of the due silly results. > > > > If you were posting this crap in German, you would've > > been fired long ago. > > You apparently do not understand it at all. WM has posted this stuff for > years in the German newsgroup on mathematics, in German. Moreover, he > has two books about mathematics on his name, in German.
And both say, in effect, about the existence of actual infinity, what Kant said about the proof of the existence of God: These assumptions (proof of God, axiom of infinity) are as ridiculous as a merchant who would try to improve his balance by adding some zeros behind his result.
I would be glad if a court would have to decide about my position based on the binary tree and my further arguments. Kant, at his time, had to stop his lectures about religious topics by order of his Prussian King. But I am sure that all this Cantor-nonsense would burst like a bubble filled with foul gas once the public got to know what crap has to be paid by the taxpayer.