In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 3 Jun., 22:33, Virgil <virg...@nowhere.com> wrote: > > > > > > I would be glad if a court would have to decide about my position > > > based on the binary tree and my further arguments. > > > > Anyone who would submit the validity of a mathematical argument to a > > court of law, knows very little about mathematics and very little about > > the law. > > My remark did not concern mathematics but only transfinite set theory.
Which is, despite WM's petty objections, a well recognized part of mathematics.
> Anybody who has seen how the advocates of transfinite set theory react > to counter proofs, of mine and of others, which are easily understood > and accepted by anybody except those advocates of transfinite set > theory
I do not speak to everyone's objections to transfinite set theories, but to WM's, and both I and others note that WM's alleged counterproofs fail on purely logical grounds, as he reveals himself to be both logically and mathematically incompetent, being unable either to analyse or create logical arguments.
There are objectors to infinite sets, like the supporters of IST, whose case is at last presented logically. Wm would do well to learn to emulate them if he ever wishes to impose his views on anyone other than is captive students.
> --- anybody who has seen that knows that only judges and > psychiatrists can help.
Psychiatry might help WM get his act together, but judges at law would have no more right to impose their judgements on mathematics than mathematicians would have to impose their judgements on the law.
Since WM brings up the issue of psychiatry, perhaps his unconscious is aware of his need for its help.