In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, William Hughes <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 11:46 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > And uncountably many X through every node. > > > Let us choose one of them and map it one that node. For the others we > > will find other nodes, below that one chosen. > > > Nope. You cannot find enough other nodes. There are uncountably many > paths > going through the node and only countably many nodes below it. > > - William Hughes
Does WM's "below" mean nearer to the root or futher from it?
If "below it" mean closer to the root node, then there are only FINITELY many nodes "below" any node.