On Jun 11, 1:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
Your claim is that "no possibility exists to construct or to distinguish by one or many or infinitely many nodes of the tree another path.
> If you have a tree that is (the nodes of which are) completely covered > by a set of paths then you cannot show any node that will distinguish > a further path from that given set of paths.
You can, however, show a subset of nodes that will distinguish a further path from that given set of paths.
