In article <069a1acd-d0f6-42f3-a8b5-d6f9c27e942e@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 11 Jun., 12:19, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi> wrote: > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > > Briefly: The set of all natural numbers that exists has always a last > > > element, but potentially infinite sets are not static. They can grow > > > (and they can shrink). > > > > Do you have an opinion on the (intuitionistic) theory of choice > > sequences? Admittedly they do not shrink but perhaps otherwise they're > > to your liking. > > Most (of the few) mathematicians who share my standpoint do not talk > about vanishing information.
We have yet to see any evidence that any mathematician, indeed anyone other than your students, shares your "standpoint".
Even those who insist on only finite sets, do it quite in a different fashion quite incompatible with WM's nonsense.
