On Jun 14, 4:49 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 13 Jun., 23:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > Your claim is that "no possibility exists to construct or to > > distinguish by one or many or infinitely many nodes > > of the tree another path." >
<snip continuing evasion>
You have agreed to
Assuming infinite paths exist:
The path p is in the tree
The path p can be distinguished from every element of P.
You refuse to agree to
Assuming infinite paths exist:
There is a path p in the tree that can be distinguished from every element of P.
Until you explain this, no other argument as to why you refuse to accept this statment will be considered.
