In article <887a8991-e0b7-4fa3-8a5d-cfea7c5abfa7@n21g2000vba.googlegroups.com>, George Greene <greeneg@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2:55 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > Then let me know one of those paths, please. I will tell you, whether > > it belongs to a counatble set. > > > EVERY path belongs to a countable set, DUMBASS. > It belongs to the set of cardinality ONE, containing ONLY THAT path! > This is NOT the same as "there is a countable set to which every path > belongs". > "Every path belongs to a countable set" DOES NOT MEAN > "Every path belongs to some(fixed) countable set"!!
WM's quantifier dyslexia strikes again"
Wm claims "For each path, p, there exists a countable set, S, with p e S" implies There exists a countable set S, such that for each path, p, p e S.
But outside of WM's world of mathUnrealism, it doesn't.
As Cantor proved, and WM has vainly tried to disprove.
