The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Conjecture Prime
Replies: 33   Last Post: Apr 26, 2013 7:21 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Watch Watch this User
Re: Conjecture Prime
Posted: Jun 25, 2009 2:20 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> On Jun 25, 2:47 pm, Musatov <>
> wrote:

> > It's not up to me, I am stating factual discovery.
> Or at least is is
> > my intent. I cannot see how multiplying to even
> numbers with a
> > difference of two will allow for a composite square
> with a identical
> > prime factors.
> >
> > Do you?
> >
> > I am asking. I have not included it in my

> conjecture because to tell
> > you the truth I simply do not know the answer. Do
> you? What are the
> > implications either way?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Martin Musatov

> when you assert "this number is prime, or composite
> with at least two
> prime factors", well ALL composites have at least two
> prime factors,
> that's what composite means, unless you require that
> the prime factors
> be distinct. so you are saying "this number is prime
> or composite",
> which is of course trivially true.
> but if you require at least two distinct primes, you
> are then
> asserting for even N, (N*N)(N*N +2) - 1 is not a
> prime squared.

Yes, I am asserting it will not be a prime squared.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.