Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Conjecture Prime
Replies: 33   Last Post: Apr 26, 2013 7:21 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Guest

Watch Watch this User
Re: Conjecture Prime
Posted: Jun 25, 2009 2:23 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> On Jun 25, 2:47 pm, Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>

> > It's not up to me, I am stating factual discovery.
> Or at least is is
> > my intent. I cannot see how multiplying to even
> numbers with a
> > difference of two will allow for a composite square
> with a identical
> > prime factors.
> >
> > Do you?

> >> On Jun 25, 2:47 pm, Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>

> > It's not up to me, I am stating factual discovery.
> Or at least is is
> > my intent. I cannot see how multiplying to even
> numbers with a
> > difference of two will allow for a composite square
> with a identical
> > prime factors.
> >
> > Do you?
> >
> > I am asking. I have not included it in my

> conjecture because to tell
> > you the truth I simply do not know the answer. Do
> you? What are the
> > implications either way?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Martin Musatov

>
> when you assert "this number is prime, or composite
> with at least two
> prime factors", well ALL composites have at least two
> prime factors,
> that's what composite means, unless you require that
> the prime factors
> be distinct. so you are saying "this number is prime
> or composite",
> which is of course trivially true.
>
> but if you require at least two distinct primes, you
> are then
> asserting for even N, (N*N)(N*N +2) - 1 is not a
> prime squared.
>


Yes, I am asserting it will not be a prime squared.
> asserting for even N, (N*N)(N*N +2) - 1 is not a
> prime squared.

Martin Musatov
> > I am asking. I have not included it in my
> conjecture because to tell
> > you the truth I simply do not know the answer. Do
> you? What are the
> > implications either way?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Martin Musatov

>
> when you assert "this number is prime, or composite
> with at least two
> prime factors", well ALL composites have at least two
> prime factors,
> that's what composite means, unless you require that
> the prime factors
> be distinct. so you are saying "this number is prime
> or composite",
> which is of course trivially true.
>

Yes, I am asserting for even N, (N*N)(N*N +2) - 1 is not a prime squared.

Martin Musatov



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.