Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Conjecture Prime
Replies: 33   Last Post: Apr 26, 2013 7:21 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Bacle Posts: 818 From: NYC Registered: 6/21/09
Re: Conjecture Prime
Posted: Jun 25, 2009 11:31 AM

> On Jun 25, 8:53 am, "Dik T. Winter"
> <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote:

> > In article
> <d0f06d18-0844-4c10-9f84-d20bfd704...@z20g2000prh.goog
> legroups.com> Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
> writes:

> >  > On Jun 24, 10:39 pm, ab <hobk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > ...
> >  > > > > >  The equation and opeation must be

> written as follows:
> >  > > > > >  (N*N)((N*N)+2)-1
> > ...
> >  > > > Now when I say it produces prime number or

> composites, I am saying it
> >  > > > produces ALL primes, except when it does not
> >  > > > it will produce at least two prime factors

> from the exception
> >  > > > COMPOSITES.
> >  > >
> >  > > unique prime factors? or do you allow a prime

> repeated, for example
> >  > > (N*N)((N*N)+2) - 1 = p^2
> >  >
> >  > It's not up to me, I am stating factual

> discovery. Or at least is is
> >  > my intent. I cannot see how multiplying to even
> numbers with a
> >  > difference of two will allow for a composite
> square with a identical
> >  > prime factors.
> >  >
> >  > Do you?
> >
> > N = 46, (N*N)(N*N+2)-1 = 4481687 = 7 * 7 * 91463

>
> Indeed. Just apply Hensel's lemma to a solution mod
> 7. It will
> also have solutions mod 7^3, 7^4, ........
>
> Note also that n^4 +2n^2-1 will be divisible by 7^2
> for n = 46 +
> 49k
> for all integer k. Note the solution at n = -3.
> It also has
> solutions at
> 3 + 49k for all integer k...... (note that the
> function is even)
>

musatov thinks he is to cool for all of us, and does
not need to explain himself clearly: we are the serfs
that attend to the needs of the genius he believes
himself to be. So he feels no need to clearly state
a problem, or he is to ignorant to be able to really
understand what he wants and what he's after, other
than attention.

er...<\$#..>&(2NN*1)

After a reply, musatov says, e.g:

Of course I mean by \$# that you need to first
multiply by 2.

Yet another buffoon, with his sorry P=NP, trashing
this site.

Date Subject Author
6/23/09 MeAmI.org
6/23/09 W. Dale Hall
4/26/13
6/24/09 b92057@yahoo.com
4/26/13
6/24/09 Guest
6/24/09 ab
4/26/13
6/24/09 ab
6/25/09 Bacle
4/26/13
6/25/09 MeAmI.org
6/25/09 ab
4/26/13
6/25/09 Guest
6/25/09 Pubkeybreaker
6/25/09 Bacle
6/25/09 Bacle
6/26/09 Guest
6/26/09 Guest
6/25/09 ab
6/25/09 Guest
6/25/09 Dik T. Winter
6/25/09 ab
6/25/09 Guest
6/25/09 Guest
6/25/09 Dik T. Winter
6/25/09 Pubkeybreaker
6/24/09 ab
6/25/09 Guest
6/25/09 ab
6/25/09 tom@iahu.ca
4/26/13
8/22/09 Guest