Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Conjecture Prime
Replies: 33   Last Post: Apr 26, 2013 7:21 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Bacle

Posts: 818
From: NYC
Registered: 6/21/09
Re: Conjecture Prime
Posted: Jun 25, 2009 11:35 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> > On Jun 25, 8:53 am, "Dik T. Winter"
> > <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote:

> > > In article
> >
> <d0f06d18-0844-4c10-9f84-d20bfd704...@z20g2000prh.goog
>

> > legroups.com> Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
> > writes:

> > >  > On Jun 24, 10:39 pm, ab <hobk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > ...
> > >  > > > > >  The equation and opeation must be

> > written as follows:
> > >  > > > > >  (N*N)((N*N)+2)-1
> > > ...
> > >  > > > Now when I say it produces prime number

> or
> > composites, I am saying it
> > >  > > > produces ALL primes, except when it does
> not
> > >  > > > it will produce at least two prime
> factors
> > from the exception
> > >  > > > COMPOSITES.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > unique prime factors? or do you allow a

> prime
> > repeated, for example
> > >  > > (N*N)((N*N)+2) - 1 = p^2
> > >  >
> > >  > It's not up to me, I am stating factual

> > discovery. Or at least is is
> > >  > my intent. I cannot see how multiplying to
> even
> > numbers with a
> > >  > difference of two will allow for a composite
> > square with a identical
> > >  > prime factors.
> > >  >
> > >  > Do you?
> > >
> > > N = 46, (N*N)(N*N+2)-1 = 4481687 = 7 * 7 * 91463

> >
> > Indeed. Just apply Hensel's lemma to a solution

> mod
> > 7. It will
> > also have solutions mod 7^3, 7^4, ........
> >
> > Note also that n^4 +2n^2-1 will be divisible by

> 7^2
> > for n = 46 +
> > 49k
> > for all integer k. Note the solution at n = -3.
> > It also has
> > solutions at
> > 3 + 49k for all integer k...... (note that the
> > function is even)
> >

>
> musatov thinks he is to cool for all of us, and
> nd does
> not need to explain himself clearly: we are the
> e serfs
> that attend to the needs of the genius he believes
> himself to be. So he feels no need to clearly state
> a problem, or he is to ignorant to be able to really
> y
> understand what he wants and what he's after, other
> than attention.


A sample posting of his includes statements like:
>
> er...<$#..>&(2NN*1)
>
> After a reply, musatov says, e.g:
>
> Of course I mean by $# that you need to first
> multiply by 2.


Once explained , after several exchanges, the
conjectures can be very easily tested with a hand
calculator or a simple program. But that is beneath
musatov, since he believes himself to be above that
work.

>
> Yet another buffoon, with his sorry P=NP,
> NP, trashing
> this site.


musatov: you're just another loser.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.