
Re: Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture
Posted:
Jun 30, 2009 1:54 PM


On Jun 30, 6:21 am, Richard Heathfield <r...@see.sig.invalid> wrote: > Dik T. Winter said: > > > In article > > <115c718cfe664a34ac7c02b57c508...@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> > > Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> writes: ... > > <snip> > > > > Shown: > > > 2*4+1=9+2=11 prime > > > 2*24+1=49+2=51 prime > > > Since when is 51 prime? > > It's odd, right? And primes (ignoring 2, which is clearly > experimental error) are odd, right? Therefore, 51 is prime, QED. > >  > Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk> > Email: http://www. +rjh@ > Forged article? Seehttp://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/usenet/comp.lang.c/msgauth.php > "Usenet is a strange place"  dmr 29 July 1999
No. 3*17 = 51
So 51 has 4 factors: 1, 3, 17, and 51

