On Jul 2, 12:20 pm, Herbert Newman <nomail@invalid> wrote: > Am Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:06:34 -0700 (PDT) schrieb MoeBlee: > > > On Jul 2, 12:00 pm, Herbert Newman <nomail@invalid> wrote: > > >> BTW, if you are *so* interested in a "discussion" with WM, why don't you > >> just use e-mail? I'm sure that most participants in this NG (with the > >> exception of Virgil, I guess) would be glad about that. > > > I don't know about most people in this newsgroup, but your suggestion > > as to email definitely does not speak for me. > > Really? So you are interested in this rather fascinating "discussion" > between WM and DTW? Is this right? You would actually MISS it, right? I > guess the reason would be that there is SO MUCH (mathematical and logical) > information contained in the contributions of those two guys (in the > context of their "discussion" here), right? I see, this would really be A > BIG LOSS, right!!!
Whatever my thoughts about exchanges between WM and Dik T. Winter, it is not my suggestion to them that they refrain from posting therir exchanges. The purpose of my response to you was just to state for the record that my own preference is not covered by your suggestion.