On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:42:32 GMT Dik T. Winter wrote:
>> "Is there some [rational] reason for keeping this spavined donkey >> on life support and littering up the archives all to hell?" >> >> Imho, you are doing no good to sci.logic with "keeping this spavined donkey >> on life support". :-) >> > Well, I do not read sci.logic, but sci.math. That WM cross-posts to > sci.logic is not my fault.
I see. (How about restricting your replys to sci.math?)
> Second, it bothers me that somebody who teaches mathematics and puts part > of his nonsense in the exams to his students (the "explanation" of the > binary tree), bothers me quite a lot.
Sure, same with me. BUT _imho_ your continued attempts to "correct" WM are counterproductive. Actually, this way WM can (rightly!) claim that his "controversial views" _are discussed_ by mathematicians, i.e in sci.math. With other words, your engagement ADDS to his "reputation"! (Note that!)