In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 3 Jul., 12:42, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote: > > > Well, I do not read sci.logic, but sci.math. That WM cross-posts to > > sci.logic is not my fault. Second, it bothers me that somebody who > > teaches mathematics and puts part of his nonsense > > Your mathelogical feelings let you assume paths of the binarytree that > cannot be identified by nodes neither by sequences of nodes
Then it follows that there are absolutely no paths of any maximal infnite binary tree which are identifiable at all. > > Try to explain that. Better drop it as what it is: nonsense.
That WM claims as nonsense whatever he does not grok is his own shortcoming.