"Whoever" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > "Spirit of Truth" <email@example.com> wrote in message > news:_GV5m.3531$Ad2.firstname.lastname@example.org... >> >> "Tom Roberts" <email@example.com> wrote in message >> news:sJH5m.13018$Rb6.firstname.lastname@example.org... >>> Spirit of Truth wrote: >>>> Tom, if you had actually a little more perception of the universe >>>> itself, you would be able to see that it could not in any way hang >>>> together >>>> with lack of simultaneity. [...] >>> >>> I see. You think your personal desires and expectations can dictate to >>> the universe how to operate. That is not science. >>> >>> BTW SR does not have "lack of simultaneity", it's just that >>> to different observers simultaneity is different. This is >>> as much an aspect of the OBSERVERS, as of the universe itself. >> >> 'Really, this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some >> people >> who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is only >> another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and >> any >> of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves >> along >> with it.' -- Herbert George Wells - "The Time Machine" - 1895. >> >> You might start trying to understand the part Consciousness actually >> plays in all this, Tom. > > So your argument is based on a science fiction story. That is not > surprising > >>> "Spirit of Truth" is an OUTRAGEOUSLY inaccurate nom de guerre. >>> >>> >>> Tom Roberts >> >> Tom, start restudying SR with an idea of comparing it to the physical >> universe. > > That's what experiments do.. and SR works. > >> You obviously haven't an earthly idea of what it really is about. And, >> perhaps, you should look up gap closure before starting. > > > > What is your problem with gap closure .. perhaps we can help you > understand ?
OK, I have given you your chance for education.
Whoever, you have shown nothing except a profound ignorance of science. *plonk*