"Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:007564d3$0$9683$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... > "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@prodigy.net> wrote in message > news:6xf6m.11516$lv5.99@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com... >> >> "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:007470cd$0$9720$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... >>> "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@prodigy.net> wrote in message >>> news:AyX5m.17210$Dx2.10573@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com... >>>> >>>> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>> news:9b33m.3581$Jb1.3295@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com... >>>>> Spirit of Truth wrote: >>>>>> I mean that disagreeing with the apparent "illogical" >>>>>> ideas in SR, at least in my case, is not to do with >>>>>> my "human" intuition disageeing with it. This real universe >>>>>> of ours does not support lack of simultaneity. >>>>> >>>>> Ultimately, this _IS_ about your personal "human intuition", because >>>>> you actually know nothing at all about the real universe -- everything >>>>> you think you know about it is really about a MODEL of it that you >>>>> have in your mind. The MODEL you happen to have constructed for >>>>> yourself does not support lack of simultaneity. That's fine, and such >>>>> a model works well in everyday life, but you have only a superficial >>>>> notion about whether or not your mental model accurately corresponds >>>>> to the real world -- you personally have no experience with regions of >>>>> the world where your personal model breaks down. >>>>> >>>>> Those of us who have studied physics, and have experience where your >>>>> model breaks down (by performing experiments at high energy particle >>>>> accelerators), know that the model of relativity corresponds MUCH >>>>> better to the experiments we have performed on the world; relativity, >>>>> of course, does support and require the "lack of simultaneity" you >>>>> have in mind. >>>>> >>>>> So this really comes down to your personal lack of experience, and >>>>> your extreme naiveté about the ability of your thoughts to control the >>>>> universe. Just because you THINK "This real universe of ours does not >>>>> support lack of simultaneity" does not make it so. Indeed, real >>>>> experiments show that it does. >>>> >>>> How silly that you try to pretend this is real: >>>> >>>> No, you haven't inderstood Einstein's lack of simultaneity. >>>> >>>> Study these carefully: >>>> >>>> Andromeda paradox in here: >>>> >>>> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity/Simultaneity,_time_dilation_and_length_contraction#The_relativity_of_simultaneity_and_the_Andromeda_paradox >>>> >>>> Captain Kirk in here: >>>> >>>> http://phyun5.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node77.html#SECTION03122200000000000000 >>>> >>>> Both those link say you are living in a block universe with the future >>>> already there. It is false. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Tom Roberts >>>> >>>> When are you going to stop posting nonsense. SR postulates nonsense >>> >>> Really .. what is nonsense about it? >>> >>>> and you keep repeating >>>> that it is correct. The math is pretty but it is made up and FALSE >>>> for this universe. >>> >>> No .. it appears very much true for this universe.. that's why >>> experimental evidence agrees with it. >>> >>>> And, no, I KNOW that SR is false >>> >>> How? Faith? >>> >>>> and I KNOW your studies have led >>>> you into a miasma of lies and lying to yourself. >>> >>> Really.. are you studying psychology as well? >>> >>>> Wells put it well: >>>> >>>> 'Really, this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some >>>> people >>>> who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is >>>> only >>>> another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and >>>> any >>>> of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves >>>> along >>>> with it.' -- Herbert George Wells - "The Time Machine" - 1895. >>>> >>>> All consciousness has a common now. Wake up, Tommy! >>> >>> Yes .. we should all study century old science fiction to learn about >>> modern physcis. > I think you are talking about yourself again. . Cranks tend to do that.
OK, I have given you your chance for education.
Whoever, you have shown nothing except a profound ignorance of science. *plonk*
