Spirit of Truth wrote: > "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:00756531$0$9752$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... >> "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@prodigy.net> wrote in message >> news:dEf6m.11518$lv5.11302@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com... >>> "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>> news:00746e9f$0$9698$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... >>>> "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@prodigy.net> wrote in message >>>> news:PAV5m.3530$Ad2.3204@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com... >>>>> "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:0072cac8$0$9664$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... >>>>>> "Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@prodigy.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:wMB5m.6803$j84.1777@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com... >>>>>>> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:i_m5m.76$Ad2.41@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com... >>>>>>>> Spirit of Truth wrote: >>>>>>>>> When SR falsely posits lack of simultaneity _the universe_ >>>>>>>>> falsifies it. >>>>>>>> How, precisely, does the universe do this? In particular, what >>>>>>>> OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS do you have in mind? >>>>>>> ........................................................................................................ >>>>>>> ........................................................................................................ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom, if you had actually a little more perception of the universe >>>>>>> itself, you would be able to see that it could not in any way hang >>>>>>> together >>>>>>> with lack of simultaneity. >>>>>> Why not .. it seems to work just fine >>>>> It does, that's why NO lack of simultaneity. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> The MATH sets you up for a fall because >>>>>>> simply by assuming "c" all the rest of the math follows, and you >>>>>>> learn that >>>>>>> and it blinds you to the actual reality around you. >>>>>>> None of you appear to realize that the most essential aspect of >>>>>>> existence >>>>>>> is missing from the math - Consciousness. >>>>>> You're getting into philosophy and metaphysics now .. not relevant. >>>>> Of course it's relevant. the idea that it isn't is the falacy. >>>> Its relevant to philosophy and metaphysics .. not to physics. I don't >>>> say it isn't important or interesting.. Just not relevant to physics. >>>> >>>>>>> Tom, in the links I posted...the "nows" were out of sync for the >>>>>>> various Consciousnesses present...that is impossible I assure you. >>>>>> Why? Because you say so, or can't understand it? >>>>> Because I know so, I assure you. >>>> Your assurance is meaningless. You need logic and reasoning .. are you >>>> capable of providing some, rather than simply your assurances? >> Oh .. so asking for logic and reasoning is ignorance of science. If so, >> then I guess I'm guilty. You must be confusing science with religion. > > OK, I have given you your chance for education. > > Whoever, you have shown nothing except a profound ignorance of science. > *plonk* > > :) > > > Spirit of Truth > >
Spirit, did you know that once you *plonk* somebody, you cannot see their postings? YOu might want to check your plonker to see if it is in working order.
