Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Prime Generalization Conjecture
Replies: 48   Last Post: Nov 7, 2017 5:14 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Guest
Re: Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture
Posted: Jul 15, 2009 4:36 AM

On Jul 12, 11:07 pm, Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 7:59 pm, mike <m....@irl.cri.replacethiswithnz> wrote:
>
>
>

> > In article <00e96645-4c61-491b-8a79-2a1ae4d3cf60

>
> > > On Jul 8, 7:01 pm, mike <m....@irl.cri.replacethiswithnz> wrote:
> > > > In article <88f7a7fc-702c-47ac-8f3e-66088faf4487
> > > > @z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, marty.musa...@gmail.com says...

>
> > > > >  Here are a list of statements, I would like to know if we can
> > > > > properly
> > > > >  decide from 2 N + 1:

>
> > > > >  (All of the below statements assume P > 2, as you asserted.)
>
> > > > >  Can we say....? (If every prime > 2 is 2 N + 1 = odd)
>
> > > > >           1. 2 N + 1 = P an (odd) prime 1/2 (of an even) 2P?
>
> > > > I assume that you trying to state:
>
> > > > For all primes P of the form P = 2*N + 1, the number 2*P is even.
>
> > > > If so then it is trivially true by definition.
>
> > > > >            2. Can we then write for every prime > 2:
>
> > > > >                 2 N + 1 = P (odd) and 2P (Even), N is also always
> > > > > even?

>
> > > > Here you appear to be stating:
> > > > For all P > 2, P = 4*N + 1, for some natural number N.

>
> > > > If so then this is trivially false as it doesn't hold true for 7.
>
> > > > >            3. Can the above statement equivocally be stated:
>
> > > > >             2 (even N) + 1 = Every Prime > 2 = 1/2 2P or 1/2 * 4 (even
> > > > > N) + 2?

>
> > > > >              2 * 8 + 1 = 17 (a prime) = 1/2 (17*2) or 1/2 * (4 * 8) +
> > > > > 2 ?

>
> > > > This seems teh same as 2 above. If so then it is false.
>
> > > > Marty, it may interest you to note that as well as:
>
> > > > For all P > 2, P = 2*N + 1
>
> > > > being true, it is also the case that:
>
> > > > For all P > 3, P = 6*N +/- 1
>
> > > > -- Mike
>
> > > This is very interesting. Thanks Mike. So we have all primes > 2 may
> > > be written as 2 N + 1 or 6 N + / - 1. Can these equations be combined
> > > to deduce something further?

>
> > Oh yes, there are lots more patterns! How about:
> > For all P > 5, P = 30*N +/- {1,7,11,13}

>
> > ...with the obvious interpretation of the {} brackets.
>
> > Mike- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Neat, huh?

#
Highlighted: Almost Syntax Aware Musatov - comp.software-eng ...
Apr 25, 2009 ... There are currently too many topics in this group
that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this
option from another topic ...
#
Dmitri Musatov's Groups: ACCA applicant (Association of Chartered
Certified Accountants), CFA applicant (Chartered Financial
Analyst), ...
#
"Musatov"... - comp.theory | Google Groups
1> "Musatov"<...> - sci.math | Google Groups just 2n^2 - 1)? My bad in
my post in this thread ( the one you quoted) musatov's claim was not 2n
(2n/2)-1, ...
#
"Musatov"... - sci.math | Google Groups
Jun 28, 2009 ... The group you are posting to is a Usenet group.
anyone on the Internet ...
#
Musatov "null zero rrror!" setsdimensional time block, to ...
Discussions - comp.theory | Google Groups 10 posts - 3 authors - Last
post: 2 days ago PNP_Complete________________[snap]+Musatov Did you
mean: model ... ...
#
Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture - sci.math.num-analysis ...
15 posts - 4 authors - Last post: 2 days ago
To post a message you must first join this group. ..... "Musatov's
Prime Generalization Conjecture": Every prime greater than > 2 is 2n
+1=P. ...
#
Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture - sci.math | Google Groups
Message from discussion Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture ...
anyone on the ...
#
"Musatov"... - sci.math | Google Groups
sci.math | Google Groups just 2n^2 - 1)? My bad in my post in this
thread ( the one you quoted) musatov's claim was not 2n(2n/2)-1, but 2^
(2n-1)-1 . ...
#
"Musatov"... - sci.math | Google Groups
anyone on the Internet. .... iii)Musatov, at age 85, finally
understands what a ...
#
"Musatov"... - sci.math | Google Groups
anyone on the ... its width remains 1/2 no matter how n is increased.
-- Musatov ...

Date Subject Author
6/20/09 MeAmI.org
6/20/09 Richard Heathfield
6/20/09 CBFalconer
6/21/09 Richard Heathfield
6/26/09 MeAmI.org
6/26/09 John H. Guillory
6/26/09 Guest
6/26/09 Richard Heathfield
6/27/09 Guest
6/27/09 Guest
6/27/09 Guest
6/29/09 Peter Nilsson
6/30/09 Guest
6/30/09 Alf P. Steinbach
6/30/09 Richard Heathfield
6/30/09 Guest
6/30/09 Dik T. Winter
6/30/09 Richard Heathfield
6/30/09 Guest
6/30/09 Richard Heathfield
6/30/09 mike
6/30/09 Richard Heathfield
6/30/09 Guest
9/13/13
9/13/13
7/7/09 Constructive Truth
7/8/09 Alan Morgan
9/13/13
7/8/09 Guest
7/8/09 Guest
7/8/09 mike
7/8/09 Constructive Truth
7/8/09 Constructive Truth
7/12/09 mike
7/13/09 Guest
7/15/09 Guest
8/24/09 Guest
8/24/09 Guest
6/30/09 Guest
6/30/09 Ed Prochak
11/7/17 4musatov@gmail.com
6/20/09 William Elliot
6/20/09 Guest
6/20/09 Guest
6/20/09 Guest
6/20/09 Guest
6/20/09 Guest
2/8/14
9/13/13