Bart Goddard wrote: > Penny Hassett <Penny_Hassett@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:h698ic$34v$1 > @news.eternal-september.org: > >> For my part, I wouldn't ban Plutonium, and I wouldn't ban JSH; the >> > > Right. I think it's a fundamental point that we'd reject posts, > not people. Any butthead who follows the guidelines gets > approved.
Imho, not even weird ideas should be rejected.
Perhaps a better idea is to give people a quotum, say, 20 posts per day for everyone, 3 posts per day for 'people with alternative viewpoints'.
At least there should remain room for threads like the one with Tim Golden about polynomials, or else it would become a very boring group.
Other advantage: it allows robo-moderation (i.e. no delays).
