Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: John Conway games of life love old and new Bob L Petersen
Replies: 203   Last Post: Jul 26, 2013 10:22 AM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Bob L Petersen Posts: 531 From: My lawn show Registered: 12/4/04
I then went back through on a check applying more powerful or allowed
Posted: Oct 8, 2009 12:07 PM
 Plain Text Reply

I skipped over the formation of the diapole for the pair creation that most likely is there at start of the forming of the sphere. If there it would not be doing the same thing as the other lines passing through the middle.

So I went on. I looked then for anything that would tell me what parttern on the sphere could happen or would be allowed. Nothing. I then assume it would have to have something that was right to allow what happens.

The pervious pages runs tell of what I believe by what I am using to calculate.

I then had many question that I could look at, at once.

The answer rings all the way back through to something that I hadn't decided mear the start of this. It will probably be one of the bigger roll through lining thing up. But I've done alot. Well enough that I don't look like and idiot next to my own machine???????? These things can be a big rocking of the boat.

Now I get to look at something and think something and just run through everything.

I applied the use of great than and ran it all the way back through to the diapole.

A question of current density being a factor.

The original reason for the flip out to two spheres rather than a single in the middle. If there is a neutral or nondetectable field in the middle that detects the dish. What would happen if it couldn't exist there from the middle? What is almost space and what is charged?

What is missing and when?

Was a three dimensional effect now reduced to almost SU(3) or a pair of two dimensional effects linked.

Still more like magnetic.

Over distance of ?blank?.

That didn't hurt a bit.

The nature of the second two ?RODS? too.

To the boys of winter

Bob L. Petersen

I then went back through on a check applying more powerful or allowed

Date Subject Author
8/26/09 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
8/27/09 Bob L Petersen
8/27/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
9/9/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
9/1/09 Bob L Petersen
9/3/09 Bob L Petersen
9/4/09 Bob L Petersen
9/9/09 Bob L Petersen
9/10/09 Bob L Petersen
9/11/09 Bob L Petersen
9/11/09 Bob L Petersen
9/12/09 Bob L Petersen
9/15/09 Bob L Petersen
9/15/09 Bob L Petersen
9/16/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/22/09 Bob L Petersen
9/23/09 Bob L Petersen
9/23/09 Bob L Petersen
9/24/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/28/09 Bob L Petersen
9/29/09 Bob L Petersen
9/29/09 Bob L Petersen
9/30/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/2/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/7/09 Bob L Petersen
10/7/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/9/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/14/09 Bob L Petersen
10/15/09 Bob L Petersen
10/19/09 Bob L Petersen
10/24/09 Bob L Petersen
10/24/09 Bob L Petersen
10/26/09 Bob L Petersen
10/30/09 Bob L Petersen
10/30/09 Bob L Petersen
11/3/09 Bob L Petersen
11/4/09 Bob L Petersen
11/6/09 Bob L Petersen
11/7/09 Bob L Petersen
11/9/09 Bob L Petersen
11/9/09 Bob L Petersen
11/13/09 Bob L Petersen
11/20/09 Bob L Petersen
11/30/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/7/09 Bob L Petersen
12/7/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
7/26/13 Bob L Petersen
12/17/09 Bob L Petersen
12/23/09 Bob L Petersen
12/31/09 Bob L Petersen
2/22/10 Bob L Petersen
2/22/10 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
2/24/10 Bob L Petersen
2/24/10 Bob L Petersen
2/25/10 Bob L Petersen
2/26/10 Bob L Petersen
2/26/10 Bob L Petersen
2/27/10 Bob L Petersen
3/4/10 Bob L Petersen
3/5/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/8/10 Bob L Petersen
3/9/10 Bob L Petersen
3/10/10 Bob L Petersen
3/11/10 Bob L Petersen
3/11/10 Bob L Petersen
3/13/10 Bob L Petersen
3/15/10 Bob L Petersen
3/15/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/18/10 Bob L Petersen
3/19/10 Bob L Petersen
3/19/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/20/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/22/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/23/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/24/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/25/10 Bob L Petersen
3/29/10 Bob L Petersen
3/30/10 Bob L Petersen
3/31/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
4/1/10 Bob L Petersen
4/6/10 Bob L Petersen
4/6/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
4/27/10 Bob L Petersen
4/27/10 Bob L Petersen
4/28/10 Bob L Petersen
4/28/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/30/10 Bob L Petersen
4/30/10 Bob L Petersen
5/3/10 Bob L Petersen
5/3/10 Bob L Petersen
5/4/10 Bob L Petersen
5/5/10 Bob L Petersen
5/8/10 Bob L Petersen
5/10/10 Bob L Petersen
5/11/10 Bob L Petersen
5/12/10 Bob L Petersen
5/15/10 Bob L Petersen
5/21/10 Bob L Petersen
5/25/10 Bob L Petersen
5/26/10 Bob L Petersen
5/29/10 Bob L Petersen
6/8/10 Bob L Petersen
12/16/10 Bob L Petersen
1/25/11 Bob L Petersen
1/25/12 Bob L Petersen
1/26/11 Bob L Petersen
1/26/11 Bob L Petersen
3/9/11 Bob L Petersen
3/9/11 Bob L Petersen
6/5/11 Bob L Petersen
5/19/11 Bob L Petersen
5/19/11 Bob L Petersen
5/28/11 Bob L Petersen
6/2/11 Bob L Petersen
6/22/11 Bob L Petersen
6/23/11 Bob L Petersen
6/27/11 Bob L Petersen
6/27/11 Bob L Petersen
12/5/11 Bob L Petersen
1/18/12 Bob L Petersen
1/20/12 Bob L Petersen
5/23/12 Bob L Petersen
6/10/12 Bob L Petersen
6/12/12 Bob L Petersen
6/16/12 Bob L Petersen
6/16/12 Bob L Petersen
6/23/12 Bob L Petersen
9/18/12 Bob L Petersen
9/20/12 Bob L Petersen
9/28/12 Bob L Petersen
9/30/12 Bob L Petersen
11/8/12 Bob L Petersen
12/5/12 Bob L Petersen
7/22/13 Bob L Petersen

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.