Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: John Conway games of life love old and new Bob L Petersen
Replies: 203   Last Post: Jul 26, 2013 10:22 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Bob L Petersen Posts: 531 From: My lawn show Registered: 12/4/04
Second pass on particles this run and it has to work or I should Run Away
Posted: Oct 23, 2009 3:27 PM

Second Pass on this run through the electron and proton

The difference this time is I'm including the ?basics? of space.

Space

Space that which transports wave or signals from all directions throught a ?point in space? of some size. Some elements of space have to be able to move in any direction at anytime. This is always happening in ?free space?.

What started as a couple of tries grew from recognizing where there was growth. The growth came from trying to get around what I'd got locked into thinking needed to be right. Picking just the part that was needed. This time I'm saying like what I have found. Everything is broken. It was doing something and it should have been like blank but.

The following is the newest rule based on what I have been doing.

The rules that are related to real effects that we see still would anywhere have to be true. Ther question then is for reconizing in how it will appear. what I need to be true is related to a known effect.

I will describe next what building blocks I wanted say caused everything in our universe.

?Vanes? ?Current? ?lock?

?Vanes? is a ?Current? carrier that exists in space, that carriers energy. We see the actions best in the form of a photon. They are also present in the particles. They move and link in certain formations that shape our world.

?Current? It is not Electrons flowing as in are world. It is a moving set of rotation or actions in space. That by their motion move power. Actions on the ?inside surface? of the ?vanes? or within the ?vanes? is something that I don't consider any thought of mine to seriously. It could be that it starts as on the inside and grows as the ?current flow? grows in that area.

The ?lock? is a formation that holds together what we call the particles. The only two with are stable are the Electron and the Proton. There is no better proof that they are locked. I went looking for what I could learn from ?Trying to figure how Pair Creation takes place.

?Pair Creation?

There are here three diapoles all told. The two one the ends getting a ?Current? that will make one Positively charged and the other Negatively charged when done. That when the two Particles have been Created the Middle ?Diapole? explodes. That was the start of the last pass the making of a model and see how it fails or how it works.

Making a Model till it BREAKS then Correct

I assumed that this parttern of squares that came from a ?Magnetic Shell?. They originated from the ends of the ?Diapole? itself. This ?Dividing Action? set up the flow. I started my look at the ?Frame? With the opening to space being squares which ?Space? flowed into it and was disassemblied. The ?Elements or Units? of Space would be ?Pulled to a charged ?Frame?. Where they would travel through the Particle. The ?Form? that I assumed the traveling ?vanes? had was of two connected lines made up of what it managed to ?pull up?. So I took a look at the ?Vane? stepping through one Channel. Moving from ?Joint? to Joint. As right next to this space that started at the other side was being reassemblied. The Squares at that time held the ?Frame? together.

I then tried to figure what all it could be doing on this walk. This stepping taking place as one ?Vane? stepped it's way through on line end or shared point at a time. Just the simplest possible model of some action taking place with what I believed could be true.

The first thing I noticed about this ?method? was that the ?Vanes? moving through would keep the ?frame? rigid. After trying to figure how make that field I want throught a series of steps of saying less the perfect everywhere. Then considered the facts about the area used for the ?diapole? down the middle. I then tried to figure out how the field around the diapole antenna was made. Origin it has to originate in the middle and then ?Fan? back to the diapole it's self. It has to be a loop of some kind so that the it can ?Tell? what happened somehow.?.?.? It just happens. From around the middle.

The next thing that occured was that these ?Vanes? could end up in ?Contruction? of Forms that Divide into smaller areas. Where they would divide that first Square into triangle. From there it went on to what if and open space in the ?Frame? allowed a ?Vane? move into a seperate ?Channel?. Then ?Vanes? pulled put from differnt ?Channels with the same Orientation or the Oppisite Needed to fit in Orientation.

The last part of the ideas about the ?Frame? and the ?Vanes?. Was first about the nature of the ?Vanes? and the effects of ?layers? over them as the ?Current? increased. I then Firmed up my ideas about the ?Joint? between the ?Vanes? More field showes out at the ?Joints? If there is there is a field out is there and place where these smaller ?vane? elements could be drawn back in. Zero lose. The middle of the ?Vanes? then became the place where Small ?Vane? ?current? element could rejoin the ?Flow?. The next look after the possiblity of ?layers? was to ?rings? and the ?sectioning? of them into ?Blocks? First considering the the area between to normal ?Rings? could allow for passing back into the flow. I had enough time into the ?Method? that I was ready to consider how in the case of the Proton it's size was fixed.

I completed that pass through determining what I could about the ?Vanes? ?Currents? ?Frame? and the ?Blocks? of ?Space? they were made from. I decided it required that a ?Ring? ?Channel had to start at the just like the basic ?Antenna Diapole did. At end last ?chanels? would fill that area.

Then took A look at the Electron everythine seemed fine. I Went on to the Proton. In adding something to fit the whole ?Method? changed.

This run right or wrong will end with what I determined.

We have seen that difference that in a Vaccum can have on things here is a ?clean empty space?. No fuss dust or anything to conduct anything away. It also adds power when needed to keep pulling space apart. (I went up there laughing rather then letting my mind start search for how far I could run with it.) All the space will end up in the ?Frame? at the middle. There is no ?Free Space? to send signals of anything through. No way to lose ?Current? to something. There is no longer an real need for the outside layers of the ?Vanes?. Size Volume who knows.

I could have put something there from the start but I went in a different direction. Like it was a trap. What could be wrong? No support Not the walking ?Vanes? but something short of the diapole we know. Better coverage of the area. Sweeping accross the area in different ways possible. The last insolated members of the ?Frame? still puting ?Current to the right parts of the ?Frame.

Like I said this look stops if this doesn't work. Waiting for a new idea. A new list of things possible.

No one pretending to say they could say they were helpful saw that coming.

Or this the next morning Oct 24 what I have ended up have is a diapole attached to "Frame" pieces it's still three legged. More later on today.

The Electron

The Electron against that space occupies no space. But appears as a ?point charge?. With a mass of ######. What ever is there is down inside the units of space itself. The ?lock? (The ?lock? is a set of actions that make a volume occupying massive) residing inside the one unit. The rest of the mass maybe feathered out into the surrounding units of ?Space?.

It Fits inside space.

Space (Just so it's fresh in your mind.)

Space that which transports wave or signals from all directions throught a ?point in space? of some size. Some elements of space have to be able to move in any direction at anytime. This is always happening in ?free space?.

Proton

First a simpler overview of the proton. So you know what areas your looking at before you get there. I need those looks to do this.

The ?Lock? for the Proton does not allow for it to fit into space it therefore occupies space. The ?Vanes? of the ?Frame? extend out into ?Space? aready gathering and releaing parts of ?Space?. There are are looking in from ?Free Space? four different spaces between ?Free Space? and the ?Lock?. The first looking in is the weak field where electrons can rotate. Next this field builds to where and electron can't pass through except at high velocity.

First ?Space in from ?Free Space? the area where electrons are captured to form complete atoms.

Here in between is the crest in the weak field. It forms a barrier I will explain more about later.

This space for Weak Interacts inside of the atom. Ie, where the electron could be trapped if it just made it inside forming a NEUTRON. Whose Life Span on average is about 12 minutes.

Further down is the forming area for the Strange Particles and the Core itself.

I am left here now with it's size saying it will not fit into space as it did in the Electron. The ?Lock? manages to work here though. I will explain. Here the ?Vanes? conitinue out into ?Space?. Space itself is being disassembled. The units of space are still interacting with each other as they near the ?lock?. Fit as can as parts of ?Space are being assembled and disassembled. Till finally they come to the ?Lock? ?Surface?.

Second pass on particles this run and it has to work or I should Run Away either way ther'll be things from this I WILL B KEEPING.

Date Subject Author
8/26/09 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
8/27/09 Bob L Petersen
8/27/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
9/9/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
9/1/09 Bob L Petersen
9/3/09 Bob L Petersen
9/4/09 Bob L Petersen
9/9/09 Bob L Petersen
9/10/09 Bob L Petersen
9/11/09 Bob L Petersen
9/11/09 Bob L Petersen
9/12/09 Bob L Petersen
9/15/09 Bob L Petersen
9/15/09 Bob L Petersen
9/16/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/22/09 Bob L Petersen
9/23/09 Bob L Petersen
9/23/09 Bob L Petersen
9/24/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/28/09 Bob L Petersen
9/29/09 Bob L Petersen
9/29/09 Bob L Petersen
9/30/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/2/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/7/09 Bob L Petersen
10/7/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/9/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/14/09 Bob L Petersen
10/15/09 Bob L Petersen
10/19/09 Bob L Petersen
10/24/09 Bob L Petersen
10/24/09 Bob L Petersen
10/26/09 Bob L Petersen
10/30/09 Bob L Petersen
10/30/09 Bob L Petersen
11/3/09 Bob L Petersen
11/4/09 Bob L Petersen
11/6/09 Bob L Petersen
11/7/09 Bob L Petersen
11/9/09 Bob L Petersen
11/9/09 Bob L Petersen
11/13/09 Bob L Petersen
11/20/09 Bob L Petersen
11/30/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/7/09 Bob L Petersen
12/7/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
7/26/13 Bob L Petersen
12/17/09 Bob L Petersen
12/23/09 Bob L Petersen
12/31/09 Bob L Petersen
2/22/10 Bob L Petersen
2/22/10 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
2/24/10 Bob L Petersen
2/24/10 Bob L Petersen
2/25/10 Bob L Petersen
2/26/10 Bob L Petersen
2/26/10 Bob L Petersen
2/27/10 Bob L Petersen
3/4/10 Bob L Petersen
3/5/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/8/10 Bob L Petersen
3/9/10 Bob L Petersen
3/10/10 Bob L Petersen
3/11/10 Bob L Petersen
3/11/10 Bob L Petersen
3/13/10 Bob L Petersen
3/15/10 Bob L Petersen
3/15/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/18/10 Bob L Petersen
3/19/10 Bob L Petersen
3/19/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/20/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/22/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/23/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/24/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/25/10 Bob L Petersen
3/29/10 Bob L Petersen
3/30/10 Bob L Petersen
3/31/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
4/1/10 Bob L Petersen
4/6/10 Bob L Petersen
4/6/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
4/27/10 Bob L Petersen
4/27/10 Bob L Petersen
4/28/10 Bob L Petersen
4/28/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/30/10 Bob L Petersen
4/30/10 Bob L Petersen
5/3/10 Bob L Petersen
5/3/10 Bob L Petersen
5/4/10 Bob L Petersen
5/5/10 Bob L Petersen
5/8/10 Bob L Petersen
5/10/10 Bob L Petersen
5/11/10 Bob L Petersen
5/12/10 Bob L Petersen
5/15/10 Bob L Petersen
5/21/10 Bob L Petersen
5/25/10 Bob L Petersen
5/26/10 Bob L Petersen
5/29/10 Bob L Petersen
6/8/10 Bob L Petersen
12/16/10 Bob L Petersen
1/25/11 Bob L Petersen
1/25/12 Bob L Petersen
1/26/11 Bob L Petersen
1/26/11 Bob L Petersen
3/9/11 Bob L Petersen
3/9/11 Bob L Petersen
6/5/11 Bob L Petersen
5/19/11 Bob L Petersen
5/19/11 Bob L Petersen
5/28/11 Bob L Petersen
6/2/11 Bob L Petersen
6/22/11 Bob L Petersen
6/23/11 Bob L Petersen
6/27/11 Bob L Petersen
6/27/11 Bob L Petersen
12/5/11 Bob L Petersen
1/18/12 Bob L Petersen
1/20/12 Bob L Petersen
5/23/12 Bob L Petersen
6/10/12 Bob L Petersen
6/12/12 Bob L Petersen
6/16/12 Bob L Petersen
6/16/12 Bob L Petersen
6/23/12 Bob L Petersen
9/18/12 Bob L Petersen
9/20/12 Bob L Petersen
9/28/12 Bob L Petersen
9/30/12 Bob L Petersen
11/8/12 Bob L Petersen
12/5/12 Bob L Petersen
7/22/13 Bob L Petersen