The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: intuitionism
Replies: 16   Last Post: Nov 1, 2009 3:33 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Herman Jurjus

Posts: 103
Registered: 9/7/09
Re: intuitionism
Posted: Oct 26, 2009 2:41 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Keith Ramsay wrote:

>> I think it's a much better description of Brouwer's
>> point of view to say that it's not justified to assert
>> "p or not p" for every p. If you can find his collected
>> works try an early paper titled, ""The untrustworthiness
>> of the principles of logic" and get it just the way
>> that he put it himself.

> Not strictly relevant to this thread,
> but it has always seemed to me that the distinction
> between constructive and non-constructive results
> has greatly weakened the philosophical basis for intuitionism.

How do you mean that?

Herman Jurjus

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.