Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Tautologies, math, and Wiles's work
Posted:
Jun 18, 2003 10:36 PM
|
|
the item on "group analogy to perfect numbers" sounds like
it's just this sort of thing.
Dan wrote:
>
> Call a finite group G "Group perfect" if
> ths sum of the orders of the proper normal subgroups of G
> equals the order of G (*) .
>
> The cyclic group C_n has the property (*) iff n is a perfect number .
>
> Are there also non-abelian groups with this property ?
>
> Thanks
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GR/0104012
galathaea@excite.com (galathaea) wrote in message news:<b22ffac3.0306172136.40a4c9@posting.google.com>...
> The modular Galois representations were shown by Ribet to have
> properties in contradiction to the four properties listed above for
> the representation associated to E. Thus E does not have a modular
> representation.
--A church-school McCrusade (Blair's ideals?):
Harry-the-Mad-Potter want's US to kill Iraqis?...
http://www.tarpley.net/bush25.htm ("Thyroid Storm" ch.)
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/plates.html
http://quincy4board.homestead.com/files/curriculum/Cosmo.PCX
|
|
|
|
