On 27 Nov., 11:43, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > We are talking about a vase which is never emptied completely! > > > Hence it cannot be empty unless "infinity" is identical to "never". > > But this describes potential infinity and excludes phantasies like > > Cantor's finished diagonal number. > > But you lose control at infinity! > So does Cantor.
> So your "hence" doesn't work.
It works if there is anyone who does not lose control at infinity. That's enough.