On 27 Nov., 20:11, Virgil <Vir...@home.esc> wrote: > In article > <ac583807-eb9d-4ae4-86f2-37f329692...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > Therefore the vase is never empty - and the only error is your > > assertion it would be empty after the last step and there was a state > > of the vase "at infinity". > > While there is no 'last step' in this infinite sequence of steps, there > is an 'after all steps' because there is a time at which every step has > been completed.
Whatever you may think. If you wish to argue that the sequence of balls has limit 0 then you are outside of mathematics. And there is no need to further answer your "arguments".