In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 27 Nov., 18:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 27, 1:32 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > So all steps have been done whereas the last is pending. > > > > Nope. Outside of Wolkenmeukenheim > > we can do all steps without doing a last step So all steps > > have been done, however there is no last step so the last > > is not pending. > > Whatever you may think. If you wish to argue that the sequence of > balls has limt 0 then you are outside of mathematics. And there is no > need to further answer your "arguments".
Since Mueckenheim so seldom manages to get himself inside of mathematics, he is hardly an authority on what goes on there.
N mathematics, it is quite possible, even common, for an infinite sequence to be completed and have a limit which is not a member of the sequence itself.
And if the problem of the balls and urn can be stated unambiguously, and it has been, then its analysis can be done inside of mathematics, even though it does not appear to be possible in Wolkenmeukenheim.