In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 30 Nov., 14:39, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote: > > > I think you are confusing the limit of a sequence of sets (which is a > > set) and the limit of the sequence of the cardinalities of sets ( which > > is a cardinality). In general: the limit of the cardinalities is not > > necessarily the cardinality of the limit, however much you would like > > that to be the case. > > If the limit of cardinalities is 1,
Since the lower limit of cardinalities is clearly 0, WM's conjecturing is irrelevant.