The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Another AC anomaly?
Replies: 43   Last Post: Dec 21, 2009 8:08 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dik T. Winter

Posts: 7,899
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Another AC anomaly?
Posted: Dec 16, 2009 7:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <k6idnaWIQNah0LXWnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@giganews.com> "K_h" <KHolmes@SX729.com> writes:
>
> "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Winter@cwi.nl> wrote in message
> news:Kup2G0.IBK@cwi.nl...

> > In article <iNWdnfmPh7NpQ7vWnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com>
> > "K_h" <KHolmes@SX729.com> writes:

> > > "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Winter@cwi.nl> wrote in message
> > > news:KunEFz.913@cwi.nl...

> > ...
> >
> > The definition you provided for a sequence of sets A_n
> > depends on whether
> > each A_n is or is not a set containing a single set as an
> > element.
> >
> > Your definition leads to some strange consequences. I can
> > state the
> > following theorem:
> >
> > Let A_n and B_n be two sequences of sets. Let A_s = lim
> > sup A_n and
> > A_i = lim inf A_n, similar for B_s and B_i. Let C_n be
> > the sequence
> > defined as:
> > C_2n = A_n
> > C_(2n+1) = B_n
> > Theorem:
> > lim sup C_n = union (A_s, B_s)
> > lim inf C_n = intersect (A_i, B_i)
> > Proof:
> > easy.

>
> Yes, my definition did not include a limsup and liminf but
> they can be added. With this addition, the limit of sets
> like {X_n} is more in line with the general notion of a
> limit.


Well, the above theorem is still not valid with your definition.
--
dik t. winter, cwi, science park 123, 1098 xg amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/


Date Subject Author
12/12/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Jesse F. Hughes
12/13/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/14/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/14/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/16/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/16/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/17/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/21/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/14/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/14/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/16/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/17/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/17/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/18/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/16/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Jesse F. Hughes
12/17/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/17/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Jesse F. Hughes
12/16/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Dik T. Winter
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/13/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
K_h
12/13/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Jesse F. Hughes
12/13/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Jesse F. Hughes
12/14/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Ilmari Karonen
12/14/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Jesse F. Hughes
12/15/09
Read Re: Another AC anomaly?
Chas Brown

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.