In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 22 Dez., 15:47, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote: > > In article > > <b484e377-9dc2-424b-80c3-2912165f6...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> WM > > <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > > On 21 Dez., 14:23, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...@cwi.nl> wrote: > > ... > > > > > That you cannot get step by step to 1/0 does not mean that it does > > not > > > > > exist? > > > > > > > > Indeed. On the projective line (that precedes Cantor by quite some > > time > > > > as far as I know) it does exist. > > > > > > But does the projective line exist? > > > > Exist in what sense? But it is a concept from projective geometry, but > > perhaps you think that is also nonsense? I may note that the point at > > infinity was developed by Kepler and Desargues in the 17th century. > > Nevertheless it has been used already by Pietro Perugino in a Fresco > at the Sistine Chapel, in 1482.
Which in no way refutes the work of Kepler and Desargues. > > > > > > > > I studied mathematics and a university council > > > appointed me to teach mathematical lessons. > > > > Well, the same did hold for my father, > > He taught math over 20 years at universities and wrote a book or two > on math? > > > but he never considered himself > > a mathematician, but a physicist. > > > > You may note that I deny to be a matheologian
Since your "matheologia" is a creature of your own invention and exists nowhere except in your own mind, you are its father and mother and only possible child.