The second look at where I am looking for no catches Bob L Petersen
Mar 17, 2010
Where am I looking at there. The ?Lock? is on one side and Space is on the side.
I have said the ?Lock? normally emits what we call charge.
The electron and it's ?Lock? exactly fits space with an ?Interface?. (I was at the same point STRING THEORY was before I added the ?Interface?.)
What I described when describing the ejection of a neutrino. Is a rebalancing of elements which in non leptons birth the STRONG and WEAK FIELDS. The ?INTERFACE? of the Electron ?Effectable? by the presents of at least the WEAK FIELD.
There's a Nobel Prize that was handed out for showing the Birth Place of the Strong Field being 100 Mev. 105.7 Mev Mass is the mass of a Muon. It sets for me at the showing of a second formation. Is a limit how it would show itselfe to someone else. I will always see half an answer at first.
The neutrino itself has type of ?LOCK? and ?INTERFACE? which are maintainable. As a Object moving at a ceratin Velocity. IT HAS TO MOVE AT THAT SPEED.
At this writing I am going back therough what I wrote about the electron and it's form or shape. We expect that it's a sphere. I pointed out that it may not be as dense as it seems.
That was my enter point for this look. (Pointed out on numerous looks at the formation we call ?Charge? I can not tell whether it is one or more lines leaving. That's important here.)
For the purpose of this look all charge lines are in use. I am now just looking at one. It is in the middle of a forming up section which looks which if let stand would be a part of a ?Weak-Strong field?. Through it is passing out it's ?reciprocal?. This just for an instant before it would almost block it's self. This is where it looks like the Weak Field.
Back and forth accross the surface of the sphere.
That is how it available for what I called the ?Soaking In?.
What I then see on the surface of the three leptons is growing variations in formations accross that surface. The last achieved only by decay. Dropping into.
Of course more of the same down to the ?Lock?.
Now if the Nobel Laureate is right above there I am looking for the Strong Field to appear. I am looking for a ?Set? point.
I am, he was and they all are. Looking for the Strong Field of the Proton.
None of these can be pair created.
Something has caused this to happened but it was not at birth.
They are based on Leptons.
The neutral of the first meson. Dies into a pair of photons. One of the two of the second spilts into three.
It really has to have formed loops which will eject particle forms.
I meant to go right to the proton the last one I didn't hurt myself by not.
That is two ?Full Shifts? of the ?Interface?. A more complex partten with a center is starting to take place. Ieaving it for now that what comes from the ?Lock? remains ordered till acted on enough. The center. The arguement supported by it's ?Core?.
This would leave the possiblity of differing levels of ?Organization?.
Different effects at different levels of penetration.
What I said about the Proton Originally still holds. The ?Interface? here fits the ?LOCK?
The Proton achieves a balance that allows the Proton to hold an Electon in it's Weak Field. Mathematically it is not where I would think it should be from looking at the Muon and Mesons. But there has to be a ?Break There?.
The sum should be all in one though. One Vector!
But that is my look I writing down for myself now.
Bob L. Petersen
Quite different things to be ?Soaked In?
Now say ?Soaked? because the electron is never going to call it that.
After having screwed with me during the time of the death of my daughter all here in Washington D.C. say I should want they to have what they all want.
No your just crocks together you need to kill another. Just like Colorado did for the good of all lairs.
Don't bring your girls around acting like it's the same as for my wife. This is all just for theft.