Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: John Conway games of life love old and new Bob L Petersen
Replies: 203   Last Post: Jul 26, 2013 10:22 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Bob L Petersen Posts: 531 From: My lawn show Registered: 12/4/04
The addtion of the look of core of the Lock and Space
Posted: Mar 19, 2010 3:56 PM

The addtion of the look of core of the Lock and Space

Bob L Petersen

Mar 19, 2010

I started out with two looks at Grand Unifcation Theory this last year without numbers. Only thoughts in my head then to paper if I like the IDEA. I am beset here by the works and those that hang around FED hopping to do something they ALL can like.

They will claim everythingto CLAIM STAR WARS.

The second one I decled what I wanted to look for a ?LOCK? that would hold particles together. Small enough to easily fit inside any real size give to an Electron.

I started my look at the edge of the universe trying to figure out how an electron and proton came out. I tried to follow every logical possibleity that seemed possible.

I started at Perdition end. Everything!

I went to see if I could learn anything usefull by analyzing Pair Creation. I ended up breaking it down into as many actions or parts that I could. I got several results I liked. I didn't conscern myself with anythings size. I then to Making and Absorbing Microwaves. I broke them down into as many possible actions or parts. I started to notice the sphere reappearing in different ways. Reuse is something you learn in programing. Functions!

I didn't know the ?Sturture? that makes up what we call a Photon. I know that no one else has anything written down but I took a look at what might make up the parts. Space requires the photon to take most at least of it's ?Actions?

A real ripper is how do you make a curve out of lines. ?Bendng? I took a look at sections that might be real. I originally assumed the section were formed as a ?Current? flow was required. Just the simplest of looks to start. The sections where made up of dounut rings linked the ?Flow? of space through them as they encourt it. The ?Current? flows down the middle. I then considered what the joints might look like for this. I chose a Castle tower top the closed almost to ?Normal. The question then was there should be something that fits using the same ideas. I closed that end that way. I then consided direction of flow. The closed end would have to be the end.

Joint like that could ?Bend?.

Not in use for flow could be what set on the inside. Aligned but not flowing an ?Current?.

I would need that. What flows? The current inside could be a part of that form.

The undoing of the form would release all energy.

I then used this check if this system would have a way of disapating energy not absorbed. Above the antenna placement in the wave.

?Rolling? ?Stirring? Over a large area. Even spreading it out over a large area would be possible.

I believe and still that space travels therough the ?Lock? This would require it's form to change. I lean toward it bing redused to a ?Current?. I then chose what I thought might be at the ?CORE? of the ?LOCK?. I What I ended up with was a two leg walking figure. Where feet and torso where two points of there had to be in contact with a ?Frame?. I worked on ?MODELS? where there could be ?Switching? ?Gathering? ?Sorting? ETC. I pushed in past where it could work. Why. Something out there might fit somewhere else. I will repeat this. I still will repeat this.

I then then backed up and took a look at a more ?Fluid? looking system where parts of space are as they must. Another sectioning of space.

I have something.

I have still learned from the Computer.

I resisted over and over trying to return to the numbers. The numbers which had left me staring.

I final looked at the following point. my ?Lock? was too small to reach the pedal. I went back to Pair Creation and added a ?Interface? The particles where formed at the ?Interface?. The ?Lock? was made inside of there. The ?Interface? ends up also being a ?Filter? or ?Orderer?. All we see is some crude version of the ?Glorious?. The weak Field and strong field meet ?The Glorious?.

I would be wrong if I said I was excited by seeing the ?The Glorious?. Maybe you should read that here this way? Or did I till it right when I pointed at the ?Big Guy? behind the two. THE NEW ENEMY!

The one we are seeing only the barest parts of.

I will continue.

Where am I looking at there. The ?Lock? is on one side and Space is on the side.

I have said the ?Lock? normally emits what we call charge.

The electron and it's ?Lock? exactly fits space with an ?Interface?. (I was at the same point STRING THEORY was before I added the ?Interface?.)

What I described when describing the ejection of a neutrino. Is a rebalancing of elements which in non leptons birth the STRONG and WEAK FIELDS. The ?INTERFACE? of the Electron ?Effectable? by the presents of at least the WEAK FIELD.

There's a Nobel Prize that was handed out for showing the Birth Place of the Strong Field being 100 Mev. 105.7 Mev Mass is the mass of a Muon. It sets for me at the showing of a second formation. Is a limit how it would show itselfe to someone else. I will always see half an answer at first.

The neutrino itself has type of ?LOCK? and ?INTERFACE? which are maintainable. As a Object moving at a ceratin Velocity. IT HAS TO MOVE AT THAT SPEED.

At this writing I am going back therough what I wrote about the electron and it's form or shape. We expect that it's a sphere. I pointed out that it may not be as dense as it seems.

That was my enter point for this look. (Pointed out on numerous looks at the formation we call ?Charge? I can not tell whether it is one or more lines leaving. That's important here.)

For the purpose of this look all charge lines are in use. I am now just looking at one. It is in the middle of a forming up section which looks which if let stand would be a part of a ?Weak-Strong field?. Through it is passing out it's ?reciprocal?. This just for an instant before it would almost block it's self. This is where it looks like the Weak Field.

Back and forth accross the surface of the sphere.

That is how it available for what I called the ?Soaking In?.

What I then see on the surface of the three leptons is growing variations in formations accross that surface. The last achieved only by decay. Dropping into.

Of course more of the same down to the ?Lock?.

Now if the Nobel Laureate is right above there I am looking for the Strong Field to appear. I am looking for a ?Set? point.

I am, he was and they all are. Looking for the Strong Field of the Proton.

None of these can be pair created.

Something has caused this to happened but it was not at birth.

They are based on Leptons.

The neutral of the first meson. Dies into a pair of photons. One of the two of the second spilts into three.

It really has to have formed loops which will eject particle forms.

I meant to go right to the proton the last one I didn't hurt myself by not.

That is two ?Full Shifts? of the ?Interface?. A more complex partten with a center is starting to take place. Ieaving it for now that what comes from the ?Lock? remains ordered till acted on enough. The center. The arguement supported by it's ?Core?.

(((Is SU(3) the major 1 8 or does it end up 4 surrounded by 4 then 8 breathing like a lepton mostly in the then correct answer would be General Relitivy's 16.

More rules more actions.

I'm I ready for my strings? I will end up with my attempt. Before I fail. That last Big Reach.)))

This would leave the possiblity of differing levels of ?Organization?.

Different effects at different levels of penetration.

What I said about the Proton Originally still holds. The ?Interface? here fits the ?LOCK?

The Proton achieves a balance that allows the Proton to hold an Electon in it's Weak Field. Mathematically it is not where I would think it should be from looking at the Muon and Mesons. But there has to be a ?Break There?.

The sum should be all in one though. One Vector!

But that is my look I writing down for myself now.

Bob L. Petersen

Quite different things to be ?Soaked In?

Now say ?Soaked? because the electron is never going to call it that.

After having screwed with me during the time of the death of my daughter all here in Washington D.C. say I should want they to have what they all want.

No your just crocks together you need to kill another. Just like Colorado did for the good of all lairs.

Don't bring your girls around acting like it's the same as for my wife. This is all just for theft.

Bob L. Petersen

Can you understand the order they come to me this time.

Date Subject Author
8/26/09 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
8/27/09 Bob L Petersen
8/27/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/28/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/29/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
9/9/09 Bob L Petersen
8/31/09 Bob L Petersen
9/1/09 Bob L Petersen
9/3/09 Bob L Petersen
9/4/09 Bob L Petersen
9/9/09 Bob L Petersen
9/10/09 Bob L Petersen
9/11/09 Bob L Petersen
9/11/09 Bob L Petersen
9/12/09 Bob L Petersen
9/15/09 Bob L Petersen
9/15/09 Bob L Petersen
9/16/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/18/09 Bob L Petersen
9/22/09 Bob L Petersen
9/23/09 Bob L Petersen
9/23/09 Bob L Petersen
9/24/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/26/09 Bob L Petersen
9/28/09 Bob L Petersen
9/29/09 Bob L Petersen
9/29/09 Bob L Petersen
9/30/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/1/09 Bob L Petersen
10/2/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/3/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/5/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/6/09 Bob L Petersen
10/7/09 Bob L Petersen
10/7/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/8/09 Bob L Petersen
10/9/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/10/09 Bob L Petersen
10/14/09 Bob L Petersen
10/15/09 Bob L Petersen
10/19/09 Bob L Petersen
10/24/09 Bob L Petersen
10/24/09 Bob L Petersen
10/26/09 Bob L Petersen
10/30/09 Bob L Petersen
10/30/09 Bob L Petersen
11/3/09 Bob L Petersen
11/4/09 Bob L Petersen
11/6/09 Bob L Petersen
11/7/09 Bob L Petersen
11/9/09 Bob L Petersen
11/9/09 Bob L Petersen
11/13/09 Bob L Petersen
11/20/09 Bob L Petersen
11/30/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/1/09 Bob L Petersen
12/7/09 Bob L Petersen
12/7/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
12/8/09 Bob L Petersen
7/26/13 Bob L Petersen
12/17/09 Bob L Petersen
12/23/09 Bob L Petersen
12/31/09 Bob L Petersen
2/22/10 Bob L Petersen
2/22/10 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
2/23/10 Bob L Petersen
2/24/10 Bob L Petersen
2/24/10 Bob L Petersen
2/25/10 Bob L Petersen
2/26/10 Bob L Petersen
2/26/10 Bob L Petersen
2/27/10 Bob L Petersen
3/4/10 Bob L Petersen
3/5/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/6/10 Bob L Petersen
3/8/10 Bob L Petersen
3/9/10 Bob L Petersen
3/10/10 Bob L Petersen
3/11/10 Bob L Petersen
3/11/10 Bob L Petersen
3/13/10 Bob L Petersen
3/15/10 Bob L Petersen
3/15/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/17/10 Bob L Petersen
3/18/10 Bob L Petersen
3/19/10 Bob L Petersen
3/19/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/20/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/22/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/23/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/24/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
3/25/10 Bob L Petersen
3/29/10 Bob L Petersen
3/30/10 Bob L Petersen
3/31/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
4/1/10 Bob L Petersen
4/6/10 Bob L Petersen
4/6/10 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
7/3/11 Bob L Petersen
4/27/10 Bob L Petersen
4/27/10 Bob L Petersen
4/28/10 Bob L Petersen
4/28/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/29/10 Bob L Petersen
4/30/10 Bob L Petersen
4/30/10 Bob L Petersen
5/3/10 Bob L Petersen
5/3/10 Bob L Petersen
5/4/10 Bob L Petersen
5/5/10 Bob L Petersen
5/8/10 Bob L Petersen
5/10/10 Bob L Petersen
5/11/10 Bob L Petersen
5/12/10 Bob L Petersen
5/15/10 Bob L Petersen
5/21/10 Bob L Petersen
5/25/10 Bob L Petersen
5/26/10 Bob L Petersen
5/29/10 Bob L Petersen
6/8/10 Bob L Petersen
12/16/10 Bob L Petersen
1/25/11 Bob L Petersen
1/25/12 Bob L Petersen
1/26/11 Bob L Petersen
1/26/11 Bob L Petersen
3/9/11 Bob L Petersen
3/9/11 Bob L Petersen
6/5/11 Bob L Petersen
5/19/11 Bob L Petersen
5/19/11 Bob L Petersen
5/28/11 Bob L Petersen
6/2/11 Bob L Petersen
6/22/11 Bob L Petersen
6/23/11 Bob L Petersen
6/27/11 Bob L Petersen
6/27/11 Bob L Petersen
12/5/11 Bob L Petersen
1/18/12 Bob L Petersen
1/20/12 Bob L Petersen
5/23/12 Bob L Petersen
6/10/12 Bob L Petersen
6/12/12 Bob L Petersen
6/16/12 Bob L Petersen
6/16/12 Bob L Petersen
6/23/12 Bob L Petersen
9/18/12 Bob L Petersen
9/20/12 Bob L Petersen
9/28/12 Bob L Petersen
9/30/12 Bob L Petersen
11/8/12 Bob L Petersen
12/5/12 Bob L Petersen
7/22/13 Bob L Petersen