Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Please listen with respect to Mr Banerjee, an vastly superior aristocratic mind indeed !!!
Posted:
Mar 29, 2010 8:03 AM
|
|
"Me, ...again!" <arthures@mv.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSF.4.61.1003290753370.10054@osmium.mv.net...
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>
>> On Mar 29, 6:25 pm, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
>> <australia.mining-pion...@neuf.fr> wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2:37 am, "harmony" <a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all
>>>> Times"<australia.mining-pion...@neuf.fr> wrote in message
>>>
>>>> news:4e2f6ae8-7977-4c54-83cc-0d1178237857@q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Mar 12, 1:43 pm, Romanise <josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Mar 11, 9:07 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>
>>>> *> Your Mathematician Woof Woof friend is disinterested in you total
>>>> *> triump over Einstein on Usenet, it looks.
>>>
>>>> Einstein was a well documented Intellectual Thief, at the same
>>>> underground level as Pasteur & Jenner by the way.
>>>> Mr Arindam Banerjee is certainly right in debugging such Fraud !
>>>> Honour be paid to Mr Banerjee here !
>>>
>>>> Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
>>>> Founder of the True Geology
>>>
>>>> -------------------------
>>>> could you back it up with proof.
>>>
>>> Dear Harmony,
>>>
>>> Mr Banerjee has all the proofs needed. I can provide some more if
>>> needed. E = Mc² understanding was developed by Henri Poincarré for a
>>> start ( and stolen by Einstein) , and as well Mr Poincarré corrected
>>> Einstein math at Nancy, where Einstein went specially for it.
>>> Best regards jpturcaud- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Dear Jean-Paul,
>>
>> I am not sure what Einstein stole from Poincarre.
>
> Hi Arindam (and anyone else similarly interested),
>
> I have seen the titles of many books, and saw one book at a library, all
> questioning Einstein's contributions as "borrowings" from contributions of
> earlier workers. I am not an expert at this, but, yes. there is a whole
> literature evaluating and judging Einstein's work as being less original
> than most people accept. Once I started to google on this and you'll find
> a lot. On the newsgroup: news.answers there was once a FAQ on Einstein's
> works, too, also documenting and questioning his works. Again, it is not
> an area I am interested in, but a lot of other people have done a lot of
> work on this.
Which has nothing to do with the validity of the physics. Something that
Arindam ignores in all his ego-boosting bluster.
|
|
|
|
