Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Replies: 111   Last Post: Jun 14, 2010 6:15 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Marshall

Posts: 1,928
Registered: 8/9/06
Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Posted: Jun 8, 2010 2:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jun 8, 9:48 am, jbriggs444 <jbriggs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 10:03 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 8:40 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > "Marshall" <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Jun 7, 7:51 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> I can compute the list of all computable reals.  There's just some numbers that show
> > > >> up blank.

>
> > > >> It's trivial to compute a list that covers every digit sequence to all (infinite) finite lengths.
>
> > > > How are you going to do that?
>
> > > > Write a program that first prints out an infinite sequence of zeroes,
> > > > and then...

>
> > > > Oops! Already a problem! There is no "then" that comes after
> > > > writing the zeroes, because the process of writing the
> > > > zeroes will never finish.

>
> > > > Please show us this trivial program that computes every infinite digit
> > > > sequence.

>
> > > Here you go:
>
> > > 1 000000
> > > 2 31415
> > > 3 2818
> > > 4 141
> > > 5 22
> > > 6 7

>
> > > It's not finished yet!  Next digit is the 7th 0 on the first number.
>
> > At no point will this process ever produce even a single
> > infinite string of digits.

>
> > Also I see no reason to think it's going to be anything vaguely
> > comprehensive in the vertical direction either.

>
> With a serpentine traversal, for every position on the grid
> there will be (for an algorithm that doesn't end up looping
> quietly or halting) a time by which the algorithm will have
> provided a digit for that position.
>
> In this sense, the algorithm specifies every digit on every
> line.


Sure. However, at no point will this process ever produce
even a single infinite line of digits.

When we talk about enumerating the natural numbers,
for example:

f(x) = { emit x; f(x+1); }
f(0);

then at no point will we be finished with all of them.
However, for every natural number n, there is
a point at which n will be emitted.

At no point, ever, in the serpentine traversal, will
we have even a single infinitely long line of digits.
We never ever produce even one infinite digit
sequence this way; we certainly cannot say that
we are producing all of them.


Marshall



Date Subject Author
6/7/10
Read A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
the man from havana
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Dingo
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Tim Little
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
HeadRush
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Dingo
6/8/10
Read Re: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
HeadRush
6/8/10
Read Re: Re: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Dingo
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Marshall
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
herb z
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
herb z
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Marshall
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Marshall
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Jim Burns
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Tim Little
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Tim Little
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/10/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Tim Little
6/10/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Sylvia Else
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Tim Little
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Daryl McCullough
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
herb z
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Discarded [was: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof]
herb z
6/8/10
Read Re: Discarded [was: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof]
Dingo
6/9/10
Read Re: Discarded [was: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof]
herb z
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Daryl McCullough
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Daryl McCullough
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Sylvia Else
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
|-|ercules
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Daryl McCullough
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
herb z
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
herb z
6/14/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
ross.finlayson@gmail.com
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/9/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
William Hughes
6/10/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/10/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/10/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/7/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Tim Little
6/8/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
george
6/11/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Pol Lux
6/11/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Virgil
6/12/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Ron
6/12/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Pol Lux
6/12/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Virgil
6/12/10
Read Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Pol Lux

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.