"Tim Little" <tim@little-possums.net> wrote > On 2010-06-09, |-|ercules <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote: >> You seem to be backpedaling like the others now, that a computable >> list is impossible anyway so I can't use it in my argument. > > There is such a concept as a computable list. Unfortunately for your > pronouncements, no computable list can contain all of the computable > reals. Just as certainly, no computable list can contain all the > reals. > > > - Tim
putting the word certainly in there makes it seem so manly
Here's my computable reals list.
The pos digit of the index real is UTM(index, pos) mod 10
It contains every computable real number, and THAT'S for CERTAIN!
