|
|
Re: Cosmic Blackbody Microwave Background Radiation proves Atom Totality and dismisses Big Bang Chapt 3 #151; ATOM TOTALITY
Posted:
Jun 10, 2010 3:30 AM
|
|
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> II. Cosmic characteristics and features; support
> Chapter (3) uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic microwave background
> radiation and Dark Night sky: Olber's Paradox fully answered
>
> I no longer remember in which edition that I had the Blackbody Cosmic
> Microwave Background Radiation as the top supporting piece of evidence
> but then thought otherwise. In the case of Wegener with Continental
> Drift theory,
> he had to wait for the top evidence of the seafloor spreading. I
> believe the top evidence
> for the Atom Totality theory, right here and now, is the blackbody
> microwave radiation.
> It is impossible for the Big Bang theory to explain that one single
> outstanding piece of
> factual data.
>
> What I am trying to do with DeBroglie is show how the electrons of the
> 231Pu Atom
> Totality form a cavity, a electron cavity or box and where the Coulomb
> Interactions
> of the Atom Totality creates this 2.71 K microwave blackbody
> radiation.
>
> The book LA THERMODYNAMIQUE DE LA PARTICULE ISOLEE
> (OU THERMODYNAMIQUE CACHEE DES PARTICULES)
> (btw, I like that title with the word "cachee"
> and obviously this book is written in French and it is
> one of the
> greatest books ever written. It is truly amazing of
> the dazzling genius
> of Debroglie to have anticipated so much in advance)
> written by
> Debroglie, 1964, considers the relativistic
> fluctuations of mass of
> subatomic particles such as the protons, electrons.
> And then associates
> temperature with a relativistic statistical mechanic.
>
>
> I am following Debroglie's intuition, except
> replacing relativistic
> mass fluctuations with statistical quantum
> fluctuations of the Coulomb
> interactions for a plutonium atom in order to derive
> an intrinsic
> associated temperature for an electron cavity, which
> is simply the
> space occupied by an electron of 231 plutonium atom.
> Let me use 95!/2 or either 232!/2 as the "Coulombic
> states" and with
> this large number of statistical interactions, I
> propose to find an
> intrinsic temperature for the 94th electron of an
> isolated plutonium
> atom.
> From pages 94-101, Debroglie works with the formula
> 1/T = dS/dL
> where T is temperature, dS is the derivative of
> entropy with respect to
> the lagrangian L which is kinetic energy of a system
> minus the
> potential energy of that system. Debroglie derives
> the formula m_0cc =
> kT_0 , then where M_0 is proportional to the factor
> e^(S/k) as M_0 =
> m_0 thus the entropy is proportional to the Boltzmann
> factor
> e^(-M_0/m_0), thence 1/T = e^(-M_0/m_0)/ d L. Now
> taking the idea of a
> neutron of a neptunium atom radioactively growing to
> transform into a
> plutonium atom in which the term d L is very close to
> 1 by the factor
> (neutron/neutron) - ((proton + electron)/neutron).
> So 1/T =
> e^(-188/186) K/1 which is 1/T = 1/e^(188/186) K. So
> the thermodynamic
> of the isolated plutonium atom or the blackbody
> temperature of a
> plutonium atom is e^188/186 K which is the value of
> 2.74 degrees
> Kelvin. The presently determined value by the COBE
> satellite for the
> cosmic background microwave temperature of the
> observable universe is
> 2.735 + 0.06 K. I assert that it is not coincidence
> that the value for
> the cosmic background microwave radiation temperature
> of 2.7 is close
> to the value of the number "e" in maths.
Reality check: would this numerology have given the same answer 5-6 billion
years ago when the CMB was closer to 5 K? Or was e different back then?
What about 10 billion years ago when it was even hotter?
--
Mike Dworetsky
(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
|
|
