Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Topic: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Replies: 111   Last Post: Jun 14, 2010 6:15 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Pol Lux Posts: 42 Registered: 6/7/10
Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof
Posted: Jun 12, 2010 12:30 AM

On Jun 11, 9:09 pm, Ron <ron.sper...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 11:36 pm, Pol Lux <luxp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

> > On Jun 8, 10:00 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 7, 10:27 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Here is an example of diagonalization
>
> > > > 123
> > > > 456
> > > > 789

>
> > > > Diag = 159
>
> > > > AntiDiag = 260   <<<<<<<NEW SEQUENCE NOT ON THE LIST!
>
> > > > YOU ALL THINK THIS WORKS ON THE LIST OF COMPUTABLE REALS!
>
> > > It works on EVERY [square] list.   PERIOD.
>
> > > > DON'T YOU!!!
>
> > > > Gee it works for 159, must work in the infinite case too, who cares if there's
> > > > no new digit sequence that can be formed.

>
> > > THERE IS a new digit sequence that can be formed, DUMBASS.
> > > THIS digit sequence, the one formed by THIS process, IS NEW, dumbass!
> > > THIS sequence IS NOT ON the list!
> > > This sequence differs from EVERY sequence ON the list AT A FINITE
> > > position
> > > (it's just a DIFFERENT, LATER finite position for every DIFFERENT,
> > > LATER sequence on the list).

>
> > > > You're all DIM!  How can you form a new digit sequence when they're all
> > > > computed up to infinite length?

>
> > > They're NOT ALL computed to infinte length, DUMBASS!
> > > The ones ON THE LIST are computed to infinite length, but the
> > > far greater number of them NOT on the list are NOT computed AT ALL!
> > > Even though EVERY FINITE sublist of them is computed.
> > > EVERY FINITE ANYthing is computed!
> > > Computer programs can be ANY FINITE length!  There is no upper limit!

>
> > > > Or as George Greene puts it, they're all computed up to ALL (infinite) FINITE lengths.
>
> > > Right.
>
> > > > And as George Greene puts it there's a new digit sequence at some FINITE point.
>
> > > Oh, bullshit!  I did NOT say THAT!
> > > The new sequence being computed IS NOT "new" at ANY "finite point";
> > > EVERY FINITE sequence has the property that a great many elements on
> > > the list
> > > begin with that sequence!

>
> > This thread a repetition. It's been established 100 times already on
> > sci.math that Cantor was utterly wrong if not stupid. Fun grade: 3/10.
> > Too long and repetitive.

>
> "established"? considering Cantor was correct I find that hard to
> believe.

Hey guys, you are not taking me seriously, are you? You are scaring
me! I was just being ironic, you know...

Date Subject Author
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/7/10 the man from havana
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/7/10 Dingo
6/7/10 William Hughes
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/7/10 William Hughes
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/7/10 Tim Little
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 Dingo
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 Dingo
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/7/10 Marshall
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/8/10 herb z
6/8/10 herb z
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 Marshall
6/8/10 jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/8/10 Marshall
6/8/10 Jim Burns
6/8/10 jbriggs444@gmail.com
6/7/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 William Hughes
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 george
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 William Hughes
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 William Hughes
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 William Hughes
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 Tim Little
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 Tim Little
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/10/10 Tim Little
6/10/10 george
6/7/10 Sylvia Else
6/7/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 Tim Little
6/8/10 Daryl McCullough
6/8/10 herb z
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 herb z
6/8/10 Dingo
6/9/10 herb z
6/8/10 Daryl McCullough
6/9/10 |-|ercules
6/9/10 Daryl McCullough
6/8/10 Sylvia Else
6/8/10 |-|ercules
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 george
6/8/10 Daryl McCullough
6/9/10 herb z
6/9/10 herb z
6/14/10 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
6/8/10 William Hughes
6/8/10 george
6/9/10 William Hughes
6/10/10 george
6/10/10 george
6/10/10 george
6/7/10 Tim Little
6/8/10 george
6/11/10 Pol Lux
6/11/10 Virgil
6/12/10 Ron
6/12/10 Pol Lux
6/12/10 Virgil
6/12/10 Pol Lux