On 15 Jun., 17:59, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi> wrote: > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > We should not use oracles in mathematics. > > Nonsense. Using orcales we can show for example that the P = NP problem > can't be solved using any technique that relativizes. This is a useful > result. > > > A real is computable or not. My list contains all computable numbers: > > > 0 > > 1 > > 00 > > ... > > Your list doesn't appear to contain any real at all, just finite binary > sequences.
A real number cannot be defined other than by a finite definition. All are in the list. Have you ever obtained a real number from an infinite definition or sequence? When was that? Who told you? What number was it? (Please give it by finite definition, otherwise the internet will break down.)