On 15 Jun., 19:27, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > On 15 Jun., 16:23, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi> wrote: > >> "Peter Webb" <webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> writes: > >> > So (B) is equivalent to the statement "there exists an uncomputable > >> > number". > > >> Right. But why then did you say the number was computable? > > > And in what form does it exist? > > This question seems utterly meaningless.
That may be the impression of cranks who prefer believing things rather than knowing them. If someone says that somethings exists, then he should be able to explain what that means. For numbers existence is easily proved by giving the value. For uncomputable numbers the existence-question is justified.
