In article <69655163-949d-4a90-a867-ce409f3b258f@c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 15 Jun., 16:23, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi> wrote: > > "Peter Webb" <webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> writes: > > > So (B) is equivalent to the statement "there exists an uncomputable > > > number". > > > > Right. But why then did you say the number was computable? > > And in what form does it exist?
If WM did say it was computable, then it either exists as a computable number of WM is wrong again.