Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > In a prior edition of this book I found out that 160 ppm of heavy > water for Earth's oceans > and 320 ppm of heavy water for Comets. I do not know of the veracity > of those numbers > but going with them, let me suggest an experiment as to how they came > about. > > Of course, in that prior edition I was using those numbers of 2X, as > an argument that the > Earth was 1/2 to 3/4 as old as the Sun and the Comets and was using > Dirac's multiplicative > creation of new radioactivities. > > But let me suggest an experiment that may resolve the 160 versus 320 > ppm issue. Suppose > Dirac new radioactivities Additive Creation is correct and welling > from the Nucleus of the > Atom Totality in the form of cosmic rays and cosmic gamma ray bursts. > > Now the proportion of salt in Earth oceans versus salt in Cometary > water is very much > different. Is it a 2X ratio? Probably not. > > But I propose an experiment where we take average ocean water of earth > with its > average salt content and we bombard it with a measured amount of gamma > rays > and cosmic rays (being protons). And it is a closed system. We do the > same for > a representative of Comet water in a closed system bombarded. > > The question is, does the bombardment increase the heavy water amount > in the > Comet system and not so much in the Earth system? Where the cosmic > rays > (protons) goes to increasing the salinity of the Earth water? Is there > such a > thing as "heavy salt"? > > And is there such a thing as a likely building principle to make salt, > starting with > hydrogen through carbon, an aufbau of building atomic elements that > prefers > increasing salt rather than increasing the density of deuterium water? > So that > on a planet the size of Earth with its huge supply of water, that the > Dirac > additive creation is locked into increasing the salt content density > rather than > on comets aufbau, increasing the heavy water density. > > So in this experiment, we have two closed systems bombarded by cosmic > rays (protons) and want to see if for some reason, heavy water is > preferred > in Comet system. >
As I wrote in the previous edition of this book, I used the 160ppm data of Earth heavy water versus 320ppm heavy water in Comets as a age argument. Citing that 2X density as that Sun and Comets were much older than Earth due to Dirac new radioactivities-multiplicative creation.
In this edition, the 4th edition, I am citing that data as possible evidence for Dirac new radioactivities-additive creation.
I was looking up salt of its sodium and chlorine atoms as to whether we can have "heavy salt" when normal salt is bombarded with cosmic rays (protons).
Interestling, sodium has only one stable isotope of Na23. However, chlorine has two stable isotopes of CL35 and CL37. Odd that CL36 should not be stable, if its neighbors are stable.
Anyway, I am guessing or speculating that perhaps the Dirac New Radioactivities of Additive Creation of a constant steady influx of cosmic rays (protons) shot from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and ending up on a Comet or on Earth ocean. That the proton would increase the heavy water in Comets to a 320 ppm but would on Earth oceans increase the ratio of the salt into "heavy salt".
So my speculation is that comets have 2X the heavy water density than does Earth but if you take into account the salt on Earth oceans would be compensation of the 160 ppm heavy water going into the increased proportion of heavy salt.
So that the Dirac New Radioactivities of adding protons to Earth and to a Comet are in equal amounts relative to existing matter, but that the heavy water plus heavy salt on Earth matches the proportion of heavy water on a Comet.
So has anyone studied and found out if the heavy salt on Earth is 2X the density of heavy salt on a Comet?
And is a chemist prepared to say that when bombarding ocean water with protons that a large proportion of the salt molecules absorb the proton, whereas on comet water that has little salt at all, the protons are absorbed as heavy water.