On 2010-06-19, Peter Webb <webbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > I see that you have stopped responding to my arguments, and have > employed the rather lame tactic of suggesting I look at definitions > on the web.
I don't care where you get your definitions from, so long as they are not from your own orifices. You are using mathematical terminology in a completely incorrect manner, and further discussion is unlikely to be fruitful until you learn what the words you are using mean.
> In the mean time, how about answering two questions for me: > > 1. Do you believe it is possible to create a list of all computable > Reals?
What do you mean by "create"? Such an list can be proven to exist, and I even provided a well-defined mapping from N to the set of computable reals earlier in this thread.
If that doesn't answer your question, you'll have to clarify what you mean by it.
> 2. Do you believe the computable Reals are countable?
