"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > >>> My whole argument is that they cannot be listed in their >>> entirety, or we could use a Cantor construction to >>> produce a computable Real not on the list. >> >> You are wrongly assuming that only computable sets exist. > > No.
Good. Then why wouldn't the "Cantor construction" you talk about above produce a non-computable real?