
Re: Preferred Frame Theory indistinguishable from SR
Posted:
Jul 1, 2010 1:02 AM


On Jun 30, 7:11 pm, Daryl McCullough wrote: > artful says...
> >On MANY occasions you discount what happens at the turnaround because > >you only look at time dilation and not relativity of simultaneity. > >The ONLY equations you use are those of time dilation. THAT is an > >oversimplification. > > Actually, with the correct statement of time dilation, time > dilation is all you need to solve most of the problems involving > clocks, twins, etc.
Gee! Show us the mathematics at turnaround for a change instead of more handwaving bullshit. <boo>
> The correct statement is this: As measured in any standard INERTIAL > coordinate system, the elapsed time T on a moving clock satisfies > > dT/dt = squareroot(1(v/c)^2)
Dude, the turnaround implies acceleration. So, the correct mathematics takes the form of d^2T/dt^2. Where is it?
> Colp's mistake, which has been explained to him over and over, > is that this formula relates *elapsed time* on one clock to > *coordinate* time in a standard inertial coordinate system. > It does *not* relate elapsed times on two different clocks.
Mr. Colp did not make any mistake. He mere understands the issue more than you do. <shrug>
> Colp is not oversimplifying, he's just being an incompetent. > Exactly like Koobee Wublee and Androcles. They are incompetents > who project their own incompetence onto othersany nonsense > that comes from their incompetence they blame on Einstein.
We merely smashed your idol of worship.
The turnaround thing is stupid. The one who first proposed that was none other than Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was actually the biggest nincompoop of all. The Lorentz transform was Poincare's work. The mistake was also within Poincare not Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. Relative simultaneity was again Poincare's analysis to the nonsense of the Lorentz transform not Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. The field equations were first derived by Hilbert, after pulling out that bogus socalled Lagrangian from his own ass, not Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. Realizing there are infinity solutions that are static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat to the field equations, Hilbert realizing what a Frankenstein he had created decided to walk away from it and allowed Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar to take full credit. <shrug>
There is really no need to blame on Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. <shrug>

