On Jul 1, 7:42 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 1, 7:25 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 30, 11:55 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > So, Inertial, whoever, and artful are the same idiot. Gee! Why do > Einstein Dingleberries have so many different handles? Once one > handle gets embarrassed, they would come back with a different one. > > > > > > Yes, the Lorentz transform manifests this twins' paradox thing. > > > <shrug> > > > > If you really understand the Lorentz transform, you will know this > > > transform does not address any turn-around. Ask Professor Roberts. > > > You will tell you the same thing. <shrug> > > > > Professor Roberts and other self-styled physicists had already walked > > > away from this magical turn-around thing to nullify the time dilation > > > problem. You are on your own. In case if you still cannot figure it > > > out. Oh, well, you are indeed a moron ranting something that other > > > self-styled physicists have abandoned since. <shrug> > > > > The turn-around thing is stupid. The one who first proposed that was > > > none other than Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. > > > This is either an error or a lie. The one who proposed it was > > Langevin. > > It is no error. Langevin was the first to notice this twins? > paradox. However, he cranked himself by proposing nonsense to resolve > this paradox.