On Jul 2, 7:17 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 2, 1:33 am, harald <h...@swissonline.ch> wrote: > > > On Jul 2, 2:16 am, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox > > > > [quote] > > > > ?Einstein, Born, and Moller invoked gravitational time dilation to > > > explain aging based on the effect of acceleration.? > > > > [unquote] > > > Wikipedia is messed up: at best it can (even it is only *allowed* to) > > accurately reproduce the confusions and errors of the existing > > literature. > > Although no information is deemed reliable in some degree, you are the > one who is messed up here. It is a common knowledge that Einstein the > nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar had proposed GR to resolve the > twins? paradox. You can also do a google search on that. <shrug>
If you google search, you will find me explaining that Einstein claimed to have solved GRT's clock paradox. ;-)
Harald
> There are many different ways to do so. Langevin?s resolution is > drastically different from that of Einstein the nitwit, the > plagiarist, and the liar. The self-styled physicists cannot even > unanimously agree on one resolution. Each one believes in his own > resolution, but all these contradict with each other. What a fvcked > up bunch. That is a trait of Einstein Dingleberrism. <shrug>
